GRE写作评分标准
【简介】感谢网友“lin3952”参与投稿，以下是小编整理的GRE写作评分标准（共8篇），希望能够帮助到大家。
篇1：GRE写作评分标准
GRE写作评分标准及ISSUE/ARGUMENT分数权重细节解读
GRE写作算分基本公式介绍
新GRE写作要求考生在30分钟+30分钟内分别完成两篇文章，它是美国所有作文考试中时间最长而质量要求最高的一类作文考试。GRE写作的记分方式是这样的，两篇作文总分都是六分，计算公式为你的得分=(Issue的得分+Argument的得分)/2，最终的计分是以0.5分为一个格。
GRE写作不同题型要求简介
1. Issue task (30min)，要求作者根据所给题目，完成一篇表明立场的逻辑立论文。
2. Argument task (30min)，要求考生分析所给题目，完成一篇驳论文，指出并且有力的驳斥题目中的主要逻辑错误。
GRE作文两篇文章分数权重分析
首先GRE写作两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的。新GRE作文中有两个项目，最后出的GRE作文分数是一个，所以如何进行GRE作文算分呢?由于AA的写作不牵涉自己观点的展开，只须指出作者逻辑上的漏洞，因此在经过训练以后，写起来并不困难;而AI的写作需要自己展开自己设立的观点，不但需要逻辑上的洞察能力，还需要论证观点的能力，语言组织的能力，因此对于中国考生来讲比较困难，难以短期内有较大提高。
但是这两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的，因此考生的策略应该是尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分(或高分)。因为如果AA部分满分的话，AI部分只需争取在4分以上就可以保证整体作文分数在5分以上。
ETS写作评分标准概述
参照ETS评过分的范文，我们不难发现：无论是ISSUE还是ARGUMENT在评分标准上都有共同之处。
1. 观点要有深度，论证要有说服力;
2. 组织要有条理，表达清晰准确;
3. 语言流利，句式复杂，词汇丰富。
这三条分别说的是行文的“思想性”、“结构性”和“表达性”，众多高分作文的考生大凡都在这三个方面做得很好，我们理所当然也要从这里入手，采取“各个击破”的方法解剖GRE作文的本质，从而得到一个理想分数。
GRE作文分类题库-ISSUE
一 教育类 1. A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.”
2. While some leaders in government, sports, industry, and other areas attribute their success to a well-developed sense of competition, a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation.
3. In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
4. Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student’s field of study because acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.
5. Colleges and universities should offer more courses on popular music, film, advertising, and television because contemporary culture has much greater relevance for students than do arts and literature of the past.
6. It is primarily through formal education that a culture tries to perpetuate the ideas it favors and discredit the ideas it fears.
7. Some educational systems emphasize the development of students’ capacity for reasoning and logical thinking, but students would benefit more from an education that also taught them to explore their own emotions.
8. It is often asserted that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit. In reality, however, formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.
9. How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society.
10. Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
11. The purpose of education should be to provide students with a value system, a standard, a set of ideas—not to prepare them for a specific job.
12. Society should identify those children who have special talents and abilities and begin training them at an early age so that they can eventually excel in their areas of ability. Othervise, these talents are likely to remain undeveloped.
13. Although innovations such as video, computers, and the internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
GRE作文分类题库-ISSUE
二 学习类 1. We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose vies contradict our own. Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
2. No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study.
3. Anyone can make things bigger and more complex. What requires real effort and courage is to move in the opposite direction-in other words, to make things as simple as possible.
4. Students should memories facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little.
5. Scholars and researches should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem.
6. In any academic area or professional field, it is just as important to recognize the limits of our knowledge and understanding as it is to acquire new facts and information.
7. Facts are stubborn things. They cannot be altered by our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions.
8. Students should bring a certain skepticis to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
9. There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer’s expectations or desires.
10. The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
11. Critical judgment of work, in any given field has little value unless comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
12. People who pursue their own intellectual interests for purely personal reasons are more likely to benefit the rest of the world than are people who try to act for the public good.
13. Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
14. The study of ac academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes.
15. The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects, facts, data, or events and see different things.
16. As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and more mysterious.
17. It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data.
GRE作文分类题库-ISSUE
三 行为类 1. Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, they in fact, prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
2. Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy.
3. Creating an appealing image has become more important in contemporary society than is the reality or truth behind that image.
4. The concept of ‘individual responsibility’ is a necessary fiction. Although societies must hold individuals accountable for their own actions, people’s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.
5. People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does.
6. In any realm of life-whether academic, social, business, or political— the only way to succeed is to take a practical, rather than an idealistic, point of vies. Pragmatic behavior guarantees survival, whereas idealistic views tend to be superceded by simpler, more immediate options.
7. It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
8. Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress.
9. Most people recognize the benefits of individuality, but the fact is that personal economic success requires conformity.
10. People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are the most critical of it.
11. No amount of information can eliminate prejudice because prejudice is rooted in emotion, not reason.
12. The most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed in particular principles and objectives. Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.
13. Sometimes imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible and thus can approach a task without constraints of established habits and attitudes.
14. In any given field, the leading voices come from people who are motivated not by conviction but by the desire to present opinions and ideas that differ from those held by the majority.
15. It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual.
16. Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a new environment and--, eventually, --to change it.
17. Most people choose a career on the basis of such pragmatic considerations as the needs of the economy, the relative ease of finding a job, and the salary they can expect to make. Hardly anyone is free to choose a career based on his or her natural talents or interest in a particular kind of work.
18. If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable.
19. People often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms, we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.
20. People are mistaken when they assume that the problems they confront are more complex and challenging than the problems, faced by their predecessors. Thus illusion is eventually dispelled with increased knowledge and experience.
21. Moderation in all things is ill-considered advice. Rather, one should say, ‘Moderations is most things,’ since many areas of human concern require or at least profit from intense focus.
22. Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty—whether to one’s friends, to one’s school or place of employment, or to any institution—is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force.
篇2：GRE写作高分作文评分标准
GRE写作高分作文评分标准以及得分点详细解读
1.sentence variety
最好长短句结合，ets藐视总用短句的人：Since most of the sentences are short and choppy, the ideas they try to communicate are also choppy.
2.insightful position
在有全面深刻理解的基础上，观点最好新颖独到(对ets来说)，但必须保证能自圆其说。
3.conveys meaning skillfully
可用于论证的一切技巧(估计老美自己用起来也得费点心思)。比如文章的行文方向，起承转合不用明显的标志词(first, second, however, on the other hand, the second example illustrating my point)，而是依靠论述的内在脉络(只可意会不可言传)自然而然的引到下一块内容。
4.compelling reasons
这是最重要的一个得分点。
5.persuasive examples
用来支持reason的，使抽象的reason更具体，更易被读者理解，从而产生共鸣，或使其更可信，更有说服力。可用的例子有自己的经历，引言。
6.well-focused
简单说就是不跑题。中心论点明确，全文不跑题;各段主题句明确，围绕主题句论述。
7.well-organized
文章采用的论述结构，分几个部分论述，每部分有几段，各部分、各段间的关系是什么。
8.connecting ideas logically
using transitional phrases起承转合词，过渡句，或有此种作用的句子，总之起到help organize the ideas and move the argument forward。
9.complexity
事物的两面性(同一事物有优点就有缺点，相比较的事物有各自的优缺点)，从多角度分析事物(分析不同领域)。
以上就是小编带来的GRE考试前必看的写作评分标准介绍，希望考生积极做好备考工作，及时调整好状态，争取在GRE写作考试中取得理想的成绩!
GRE作文Argument
A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership with Sherwood Animal Shelter to institute an adopt-a-dog program. The program would encourage dog ownership for patients recovering from heart disease, which should reduce these patients' chance of experiencing continuing heart problems and also reduce their need for ongoing treatment. As a further benefit, the publicity about the program would encourage more people to adopt pets from the shelter. And that will reduce the incidence of heart disease in the general population.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
新GRE Issue写作范文透析
Issue
“The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.”
观点陈述型作文/[题目]
“被置于媒体审视下的任何人，其名誉终将受毁损。”
Sample Essay
The intensity of today's media coverage has been greatly magnified by the sheer number and types of media outlets that are available today. Intense competition for the most revealing photographs and the latest information on a subject has turned even minor media events into so-called “media frenzies”. Reporters are forced by the nature of the competition to pry ever deeper for an angle on a story that no one else has been able to uncover. With this type of media coverage, it does become more and more likely that anyone who is subjected to it will have his or her reputation tarnished, as no individual is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes. The advances in technology have made much information easily and instantaneously available. Technology has also made it easier to dig further than ever before into a person's past, increasing the possibility that the subject's reputation may be harmed.
[范文正文]
当今媒体报道的力度，由于当今时代所能获得的媒体渠道那前所未有的数量和种类，从而被极大地增强。围绕着对最具暴露性的图片及对某一题材最新信息所展开的竞争，使哪怕是次要的媒体事件也转变为所谓的“媒体疯狂”。由于竞争的本质，记者们被迫就某一项报道作深度采访，以其窥探到一个任何其他人都无法揭示的视角。随着这类媒体报道的出现，任何被置于媒体报道之下的人，其名誉越来越有可能被玷污，因为“金无赤金，人无完人”。每个人都有可能犯错误。技术进步使大量的信息在第一瞬间便被轻易获取。技术也使媒体得以比以往任何时候更深入地去挖掘一个人的过去，从而更增加了当事人名誉受损的可能性。
The above statement is much too broad, however. “Anyone” covers all people all over the world. There are people whose reputations have only been enhanced by media scrutiny. There are also people whose reputations were already so poor that media scrutiny could not possibly diminish it any further. There may very well be people that have done nothing wrong in the past, at least that can be discovered by the media, whose reputations could not be diminished by media scrutiny. To broadly state that “anyone” subjected to media coverage will have his or her status sullied implies that everyone's reputation worldwide is susceptible to damage under any type of media scrutiny. What about children, particularly newborn children? What about those people whose past is entirely unknown?
然则，上述陈述涵盖面过于宽泛。“任何人”涵盖了世界上所有的人。有些人的名誉反而会因为媒体的聚焦而陡然显赫起来。也有些人，其名声早就如此之糟糕，以致于媒体的聚焦再也无法让它受到更坏的毁损。笼统地陈述受媒体报道的“任何人”均会使其地位被玷污，这暗示着全球每个人的名声在任何种类的媒体聚焦下均易于遭诟病。那么，对于天真无辜的孩子们，尤其新生婴儿，情况会如何?对于那些其过去根本无人知晓的人来说，情况又会是什么样呢?
Another problem with such a broad statement is that it does not define the particular level of media scrutiny. Certainly there are different levels of media coverage. Does merely the mention of one's name in a newspaper constitute media scrutiny? What about the coverage of a single event in someone's life, for example a wedding or the birth of a baby? Is the media coverage of the heroic death of a firefighter or police officer in the line of duty ever going to diminish that person's reputation? It seems highly unlikely that in these examples, although these people may have been subjected to media scrutiny, these individual's reputations are undamaged and potentially enhanced by such exposure.
对于这样一项笼统的陈述而言，它的另一个问题是没能明晰界定媒体聚焦的具体程度。媒体的报道毫无疑问存在程度上的差别。只在报纸上提及一个人的名字，是否算作媒体聚焦?对某人一生中单独一次事件(如婚礼或孩子出生)的报道这也算媒介聚焦吗?媒体对消防队员或警官因公而死的英雄壮举进行报道，难道也会毁损该人的名声吗?在这些实例中，其名声受损的事情极不可能发生。虽然这些人可能被置于媒体审视之下，但其名声却会完好无损，且潜在地可因这些披露而得以提高。
篇3：如何从评分标准入手备考GRE写作
如何从评分标准入手备考GRE写作
GRE写作满分要点解析，主要包括以下四点：
1、迎合GRE考试评卷人的评卷思路：
每个评卷人对你文章的评阅非常快，不可能对每个细节都很仔细地去看。考生应该迎合评卷人的评卷思路，用最规范的结构和最清晰的表达来体现自己的思路：首段要鲜明地提出观点，中间段落层次要拉开，每段的开始应该就是该段的topic sentence。
2、熟练掌握新GRE写作题库：
为了达到公平，ETS公布了它考试的所有写作题库，那么为了达到能和native speaker一起竞争，考生应该在考前对所有题目都进行预习(节约考试时的审题时间)，并通过100-150个提纲的写作了解GRE写作的一般结构，通过30-50篇写作来练习自己的写作思路和表达。对题库中的题目越熟练，对考试越有利。
3. 新GRE写作评分注重三方面
首先，从ETS公布的各分数段评分标准看，其评分主要注重以下三个方面：①、逻辑分析能力(要求insightful);②、文章的组织(要求well-organized);③、语言能力(要求standard written English; concise; varied structure等)。
4. 尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分
由于AA的写作不牵涉自己观点的展开，只须指出作者逻辑上的漏洞，因此在经过训练以后，写起来并不困难;而AI的写作需要自己展开自己设立的观点，不但需要逻辑上的洞察能力，还需要论证观点的能力，语言组织的能力，因此对于中国考生来讲比较困难，难以短期内有较大提高。
但是这两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的，因此考生的策略应该是尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分(或高分)。因为如果AA部分满分的话，AI部分只需争取在4分以上就可以保证整体作文分数在5分以上。
GRE issue写作优秀实例：钱是否花在当下
题目：
“It is more important to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems than to spend it on long-term research that might help future generations.”
与其花钱进行可能有助于后代的长期性研究，还不如把钱花在迫在眉睫，已经存在的社会问题上。
正文：
In this contradictory era of pleasure and pain, loyalty and treachery, joy of life and fearof future, which arise a considerable of problems government has been bored by. No matter how serious and urgent one aspect turns out to be in a certain period,government is supposed to call for a balance between allocating money for immediateproblems and spending it on long-term research when making budget.
To be responsible for current citizens, government should solve those existing socialproblems, such as unemployment, illiteracy, and social crimes, in order to oil the socialmachine. To some extent, increasing the amount of jobs may get more benefit thanitself, because it is a way to release social pressure and dissatisfaction of thoseunemployed workers who may eventually become a ticklish factor to society.
Additionally, illiteracy is to society as the shortest baffle is to a cask. And it could donothing but lengthen the shortest baffle to the same length as the other baffles if morewater is supposed to be poured in this cask. As a malignant tumor, social crimes do harm to the economy and security of our society and, in some cases, is a potential fuse especially when there is an internal or external opposition to the government, so, to keep society stabilized and booming, government has to pay more attention to social crimes.
If not, citizens may feel under peril and lose confidence to the ruling class. As a result, for saving money, the government is bogged down in Sargasso Sea of troubles.Nonetheless, the governors are not born only for today’s people. That is to say,another significant and meaningful responsibility of government is to try its best to supply our posterity a society that consists of people who are well educated and obtain a desirable job or career, less juvenile crime and drug, and stable economy. As
H.W.Beecher pointed, “We should so live and labor in our time that what came to us as seed may go to the next generation as blossom, and what came to us as blossom may go to them as fruit. This is what we mean by progress.”It is true that long-term research could not give out an immediate value, for example,how to afforest a wasteland, but we shouldn’t be so narrow foci and misprize the real value normally coming up in about decades or more. “Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards”, said by Kierkergaard. The phrase “be lived forwards” here, in this case, means digging out the profit in future, the same as futures. Although no one knows whether or not the future is in concord with what we expect, we still could invest in it based on a pile of wide investigation and a cogent demonstration rather than a gambling.
Simply put, without spending money on immediate and existing social problems, our society cannot keep flourish and robust. Without investing on so many long-term researches, we will live no guarantees and aimless. Therefore, to ensure the stability and health as well as lasting development of our society, spending money on immediate social problems and investing on long-term researches weigh the same.
GRE issue写作优秀实例：竞争利弊问题
题目： “Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society.”
归根结底，竞争对于社会是利多弊少。
正文：
Darwin suggested that the process of evolution is one based on competition. This deadly competition weeds out the weak and only the fittest of the species survives. Humans, being the product of millions of years of evolution, are by nature, competitive beings. Yet, humans are also social beings. Like the bees in the hive, we are not very successful living completely on our own. We need to cooperate with other individuals for our survival. Thus, a conflict ensues, between our innate competitiveness, and our need to cooperate. There are pros and cons associated with both. However, it is my belief that overall, competition, is more detrimental than beneficial to human society.
First, let us try to identify why there is competition in the first place. In an environment abundant with resources, where supply outstrips demand, there is very little need for the inhabitants to fight with each other over them. This is not the case on planet earth. Resources are limited, and there is constant jostling to get to the front of the queue to get acquire them. For example, thousands of prospective students apply to gain entrance to top universities around the world, but there are only a handful of places in those universities. Thus, there is competition to get into to these hallowed institutions of higher learning.From a utilitarian perspective, competition is a good thing. In evolution it is responsible for the elimination of “weak” genes. In the business environment, it gets rid of the weaker players. In politics, it weeds out unpopular candidates. In academia, it gets rid of weak students.
Furthermore, competition leads to self improvement. Businesses will strive to offer better products and services at lesser prices. The consumer reaps rich rewards from this competitive spirit. Politicians strive to do the utmost for the people, so they would get reelected. Students excel in there studies, trying to outdo each other.
Thus, ostensibly, competition is responsible for the betterment of the society as a whole. However, this is just the superficial view. Underneath the surface, competition, in every aspect, is slowly eating away at the very fabric of the society.
While it is true to say that competition in corporate world has brought great benefits to the consumer, the society as “Missed A here”whole is playing a great price for it. Most businesses are exploiting cheap labour in the third world to maximise their profits. There are thousands of sweatshops run by well known western corporations in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh and China. People are forced to work in squalid conditions, often 16 hours a day. They are lucky to receive a dollar a day for there labours. The moment a government in any of these countries try to improve the working conditions of the employees, these multinational giants flee the country, often leaving whole communities facing financial ruin. The corporations are aware that there are plenty of other labour markets that could be exploited with gay abandon.
That is just the human cost. What about the environmental costs? Competition has forced many corporations to “stream line” their operations. Environmental standards are normally the first victims of this “stream line” process. A significant amount of environmental pollution and land degradation has been blamed on industry, yet the factories keep producing more and more. Thousands of items go unsold each year due to competition. Only a fraction of this merchandise is recycled. The rest goes to the already overflowing landfills.
In politics, the detrimental effects of competition are blatant. Politicians often resort to popular yet socially damaging policies to gain votes. These measures include imprudent spending to rabble rousing. The current volatility in Israel and Palestine, the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, and the famine in Zimbabwe are all, at least partially, problems created by politicians to get elected.
It has been said that education is one sphere where competition has always had a beneficial influence. Even this claim is dubious. Due to competition students are less likely to exchange ideas with one another, thus enriching the student population as whole. Furthermore, competition drives students to study well to pass exams, but not to gain wisdom. Students spend many hours preparing for standardised tests; tests which many believe are inherently flawed. Thus, it is often not the most intellectual student who succeeds, but the most competitive.
Competition is an inborn human trait. It has some positive qualities, but overall, it does far more harm than help to the society. As intelligent beings, humans can transcend their evolutionary weaknesses. Thus, humans should rely less competition and more cooperation for the sake of the society.
篇4：GRE写作ISSUE作文评分标准解析
GRE写作ISSUE作文评分标准解析 规定时间内写出高分作文要做到这几点
GRE作文评分比标准
GRE作文满分为6分，以0.5分为最小计分单位，作文成绩单独计算，不计入语文数学部分的总分，对于大部分学校来说，4.5分左右的作文成绩就已经是比较好的分数，部分文科类专业也可能要求更高的分数。
GRE写作Issue满分评分标准解读
In addressing the specific task directions, a 6 response presents a cogent, well-articulated examination of the argument and conveys meaning skillfully.
A typical paper in this category exhibits the following characteristics:
1.articulates a clear and insightful position on the issue in accordance with the assigned task
2.develops the position fully with compelling reasons and/or persuasive examples
3.sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically
4.conveys ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
5.demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English(i.e., grammar, usage and mechanics), but may have minor errors。
标准解读 要点 1： articulates a clear and insightful position on the issue in accordance with the assigned task
关键词：insightful ，position，in accordance with
1. insightful即Data Mining(数据挖掘)。
GRE写作强调思辨，挖掘题目的核心概念十分必要。 例如GRE作文题库中有一道题目：事物的差异性重要还是相似性重要? “insightful”的分析应当是通过similarity 和 difference的现象看到背后所体现的本质--矛盾(paradox)的思想。 具体来说就是要学会观察相似事物的差异性，以及差异事物的相似性，辩证地分析事物。 因此本题真正考查的是“看待事物的方法论”, 而非简单的选择“哪一个重要”。
2. position
在GRE issue写作里，position不等于attitude，即立场不等于态度。 这又是GRE作文中对于逻辑辩证点的考查。 很多高分GRE文章都是对一个事物的利弊进行具体问题的具体分析，而非进行倾向性的态度传递，这也符合事物的基本规律，即任何事物都具有两面性。 TOEFL独立写作非常强调态度的传达，但GRE作文更强调分析事物的方法论和论证过程。
3. in accordance with
指切题(on-topic)的论述：论点、论据，论证要和题目要求一致，这个评分点和上文中insightful的要求一脉相承。 许多GRE issue题目的含义很难依赖字面意思来理解， 题目的“隐藏逻辑”和“隐藏含义”要求考生首先要准确地“审题”、思考题面背后的含义， 然后选择相关的论点和论据进行支撑。
要点 2： develops the position fully with compelling reasons and/or persuasive examples
关键词：reasons, persuasive
1. reasons=reasoning
GRE作文强调推理，并且推理的过程远重要于推理的结果。在GRE作文里，解释Why比给出What 更重要，因为考官是通过审视推理过程来判断考生的逻辑陈述能力。 因此建议考生在准备GRE作文时，应把重点放在分析推理上，而不是频频给出各类结论。
2. persuasive=relevant
在GRE作文里，考生给出的所有例证都要有说服力。要有说服力，首先要与文中的论证相关。无论例证是来自西方世界还是中国，相关的例子才是和论证匹配的内容。
要点 3： sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically
关键词：analysis, logically
1. analysis
GRE写作强调论述过程与分析过程，而非结论本身。
2. logically
“GRE写作的逻辑”包含形式逻辑和内容逻辑: 形式逻辑就是指文章起承转合的逻辑信号、逻辑连接词。它们连接不同的内容,使行文显得有层次。内容逻辑就是指文章含义推导过程的严密性，和我们后文即将解读的排序方式是高度相关的。
要点 4： conveys ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
关键词：effective, variety
1. effective
有效的--所谓有效的词汇，是指根据语境所选择“恰当的用词”。 在GRE写作里考生不需要哗众取宠地用“大词、难词”来显示词汇量。 真正的高手能够用简单而精确的词语来阐述深刻的道理。
2. variety
用词用句的变化性能有效地体现行文语言的多样性。
要点 5： demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English (i.e., grammar, usage and mechanics), but may have minor errors
关键词：standard written English, may have minor errors
1. standard written English
即使用标准的书面英语。英语口语体不合适用于GRE这类准学术型的分析性写作中。 因此考生应注意标准的书面英语的语法，用词和文法。
2. may have minor errors
GRE作文允许有错误的存在。 考官认为，一篇满分的文章可以有错误，尤其是个别的拼写错误、语法错误和用词不当。这不影响一篇文章得高分。只要这篇文章准确地提炼了要点、做到了精确的对应匹配、逻辑性强、语言水平高即可。
GRE Issue写作范文详细解析
Issue
“People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does.”
Sample Essay
Teamwork as a whole can naturally produce an overall greater productivity through the concept of “synergy”, where the total of the whole is greater than the sum of its individual parts. But the idea that people work more productively in teams rather than as individuals is going to vary greatly between the types of teams that are organized, the end reward or motivation for both the team and the individuals, as well as the individuals themselves.
Regarding individuals, some people are born with the desire to succeed, no matter what the situation or task that they are facing. These people may evolve into the classic “Type A” personalities that work ferociously because they are driven by an internal fire that says they must always be doing something, whether individually or as part of a team. Other people may desire to be less socially involved or are very highly competitive with other people. For these people, their work is most productive as individuals, because the very idea of cooperating with other people limits their effectiveness and efficiency because they simply do not want to be a part of the team. Whether this mindset is innate or developed over time does not matter, it is merely the state of their being and neither motivation nor rewards can generate inside them the desire to work collectively as a team.
Some people are highly motivated by social interaction and the desire to work with others towards a collective effort. Obviously these individuals are at their most productive when working as part of a team. Organizational behavioral studies have shown that Asian cultures are much more likely to develop this type of collective behavior as opposed to the more individualistic behavior associated with Western cultures. It could naturally be assumed then that there may be cultural values that can determine whether people are at their most productive individually or as part of a team.
Another variable is the end reward that is involved with the task at hand. Will the rewards be greater if the team works together towards a common goal, or are the rewards more geared toward individual performance? To the extent that the individual is motivated by the end reward, obviously his or her performance inside of a team may be more or less productive with respect to the entire team, depending on how the performance is rewarded. Individual goals may interfere with the group performance. Synergies may not be achieved because the individuals are not working towards a whole “sum” but rather towards an individual reward. Productivity thus will vary for each person as a team member or as an individual depending on the degree to which that person is motivated by an individual or overall team reward.
Finally, the degree of productivity of a person will depend upon the type of team that is organized. Is the group composed of equally contributing individuals? Does the group have an outstanding leader that can motivate both the individuals and the team as a whole? From a pure productivity standpoint, the presence or absence of a charismatic and exceptional leader can make all the difference whether a person would be more productive as a part of a team or as an individual. Personality types that work well together can prove to be much more productive as part of a team than as individuals, and vice versa.
Fundamentally, measures of productivity depend greatly on the individuals themselves. The dilemma facing leaders in all areas of life is how to best assess these individuals to determine how to best harness their capabilities to reach their ultimate productive capabilities. Whether a person is more productive alone or while working in concert with others is one of the great challenges that leaders and managers must face to accomplish tasks effectively and efficiently.
观点陈述型作文/[题目]
“当人们以团队的形式工作时，要比以孤军奋战的形式来得更加富有成效。团队的协同工作需要相互合作，它比个人竞争更能激励人们。”
[范文正文]
总体而言，团队的协同工作自然能通过“增效作用”(Synergy)这一理念而带来更高程度的整体生产效率，因为在这里，整体大于个体相加之总和。然则，“当人们以团队的形式工作时，要比以孤军奋战的形式来得更加富有成效”这一观念注定会产生巨大差异，取决于所组织起来的团队的类别，团队与个人所能获得的终极回报或激励，以及个人本身。
关于个人，有些人天生就具有获取成功的欲望，无论他们所面临的情形或任务是什么。这些人会演变为工作狂这一经典的“A类”人格，因为受到一股内心的热火所驱使，这股热火时刻告诉他们必须不停地“有所事事”，无论是作为个人抑或是作为团队的一分子。另一些人则可能希望不必那么多地介入社会，或者他们倾向于与其他人激烈竞争。对这些人而言，作为个人，他们工作起来会最富有成效，因为由于他们根本就不想成为任何团队的一部分，与他人合作便会限制他们的效率。这一思想倾向是否与生俱有，还是随着时间的推移而形成，这都无关紧要。这仅仅只是他们的一种生存状态，无论是动机还是回报，都无法在其内心深处激发起作为一个团队集体工作的欲望。
有些人，由于社会互动以及与他人协作去实现某种集体努力的欲望，而具有极强的动机。显然，这些个人在作为团队的一部分进行工作时，他们便会处在其最富有成效的状态。组织行为学研究表明，亚洲文化更有可能形成此类集体性行为，与那种常和西方文化联系在一起的较为个人主义的行为构成对比。这样，人们自然会认为，某些文化价值观可以决定人们是否作为个人还是作为团队的一部分工作起来最富有成效。
GRE满分作文分析
题目：
Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.
I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?
What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.
分析：
字数：651
语言：平实的语句完全没有网络流行模板的痕迹，也是许多过了6级的考生通过练习可以达到的水平。
I must say that I reject this statement.
Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt.
Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
……
当然，这并不意味，在GRE作文考试中，平实的语言比润色后的语言有更多的优势。从这篇作文中，我们可以得到以下两条重要信息：
1、通过记忆大量模板使语言“全副武装”、“气势汹汹”并非高分作文的必要条件，这种方式的弊端在课堂上我们已阐述过。
2、在陈述idea的过程中，体现出critical thinking才是成功的关键。我们在课堂上对critical thinking这一概念做过多次详细的解释，现在请大家一起来体会这一概念在文中的运用。
第一段：
(表明立场)I must say that I reject this statement. (让步)While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, (折回自己立场)that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it.
第二段：
(概述科技的两面性)Technology has helped, and it has hurt. (具体讨论科技的贡献)Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. (具体讨论科技的危害)But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. (表明已考虑到科技的危害，但是依然坚持自己立场)And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
第三段：
(提出反方的立场)Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. (通过具体论据反驳反方的观点)But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?
第四段：
(在第三段驳论的基础上进一步立论)What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
第五段：
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. (指出支持观点存在的一点不足)But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. (解决方案)We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hospital, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.
篇5：如何从评分标准入手备考GRE写作
如何从评分标准入手备考GRE写作
GRE写作满分要点解析，主要包括以下四点：
1、迎合GRE考试评卷人的评卷思路：
每个评卷人对你文章的评阅非常快，不可能对每个细节都很仔细地去看。考生应该迎合评卷人的评卷思路，用最规范的结构和最清晰的表达来体现自己的思路：首段要鲜明地提出观点，中间段落层次要拉开，每段的开始应该就是该段的topic sentence。
2、熟练掌握新GRE写作题库：
为了达到公平，ETS公布了它考试的所有写作题库，那么为了达到能和native speaker一起竞争，考生应该在考前对所有题目都进行预习(节约考试时的审题时间)，并通过100-150个提纲的写作了解GRE写作的一般结构，通过30-50篇写作来练习自己的写作思路和表达。对题库中的题目越熟练，对考试越有利。
3. 新GRE写作评分注重三方面
首先，从ETS公布的各分数段评分标准看，其评分主要注重以下三个方面：①、逻辑分析能力(要求insightful);②、文章的组织(要求well-organized);③、语言能力(要求standard written English; concise; varied structure等)。
4. 尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分
由于AA的写作不牵涉自己观点的展开，只须指出作者逻辑上的漏洞，因此在经过训练以后，写起来并不困难;而AI的写作需要自己展开自己设立的观点，不但需要逻辑上的洞察能力，还需要论证观点的能力，语言组织的能力，因此对于中国考生来讲比较困难，难以短期内有较大提高。
但是这两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的，因此考生的策略应该是尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分(或高分)。因为如果AA部分满分的话，AI部分只需争取在4分以上就可以保证整体作文分数在5分以上。
GRE写作高分范文：北美GRE写作满分范文
The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:
“Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
GRE首段
This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.
GRE中间段1
The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.
GRE中间段2
This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.
GRE中间段3
Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.
GRE末端
In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。， coal mine)。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.
GRE这篇官方钦定满分的范文，其最明显的优点在于：
1. 字数高达599words, GRE充分体现了字数为王的判分倾向。
2. 标准的五段制，首段、GRE末端，中间三段，看上去很美。
3. 没有陈词滥调、GRE满篇废话的模板式语言。
只有以上三点离满分还是很远的，GRE之所以SIX，我看更重要的在于，每段各尽其责，既独立又统一，形成了完整的ARGUMENT，specifically:
1. 首段再现了原TOPIC的推理过程，GRE并指出其assumptions多有不适;尤其令阅卷人高兴的是：首段在最后简化罗列了推理中的三个问题。要知道美国人就喜欢的作文---总分式，在首段就把三个ideas罗列出来，然后在中间三段分别展开，先总后分，一目了然。
2. 中一的TS -- “The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment.”可谓是一针见血，一剑封喉。对于这样严重的推理漏洞，如果不首先指出，其argument必然软弱乏力。此所谓Topic中的 “必削点”，不可不察。
3. 中二的TS – “This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment.”这可谓是剑走偏锋，独辟蹊径，出人所料。文章竟然批评了Topic以钱为本经营理念，提出了要以人为本，这样写是有一定风险，毕竟这不是Issue。那本文是如何化险为夷的呢?且看本段最后一句“this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.”我不由得长舒一口，人家再次回归了，又回到了Topic中以“Money”为本的推理。
4. 中三的TS – “Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer.”这充分体现了作者不只是坐而论道的arguer，而是关心其可行性的现实主义者，考虑到方案本身的可行性和局限性。
5. 末端不但对首段提出的论点做出了重复性的总结，GRE而且又不厌其烦地把中间三段的ideas一一罗列。如此“啰嗦”估计令某些同学略有不齿，但这恰恰是美国人的最爱，cultural shock了吧?
本文最令我欣赏的地方，GRE就是对EXAMPLES的运用
1. 中间段一，运用了“设例”GRE(假设的情况)，$100 million啦、$5,000了，很幼稚是吧?可美国人喜欢啊;咱中国的学生，尤其是理工科的，喜欢用一些相当高深的例子，有没有想过那些阅卷老师能看懂吗?尤其是在极短时间内，他们IQ又不高，知识又不多，联想又不丰富……
2. 中间段二，运用了“具例”GRE(具体的例子)，举一个妇孺皆知的Toyota例子把想说明的问题统统道出，再次体现出美国人喜欢浅显易懂的事例。
3. 中间段三，运用了“泛例”GRE(某一类人、团体或组织)，通过采煤行业指出了计划可行性的所受到的制约，一个多么质朴无华的泛例，充分地考虑到了阅卷老师的理解能力。
以上这一切怎能不让美国阅卷者频频颔首，GRE啧啧称善呢?他或她手中的笔在纸上划出了一条美丽的弧线 —— 6
相反，有些中国学生，凭借自己繁密的逻辑、GRE渊深的例子和云雾缭绕的行文，每每令那些阅卷者咬唇咂舌，shrug连连，又怎能获得一个理想的分数呢?你挑战了他的智商，他必然报复你的分数。
GRE作文写作技巧之句子扩充
很多人苦恼句子写不长，一句话写下来才6~7个词不到，而且这还是用了前面说的in the first place的用法。怎么办?
举个例子，也通过扩充这个句子来阐述我所谓的写作的方法。
例子：Firstly, I agree with you.
比如有个学生要表达“首先我同意你”的这个意思，于是他写了这句话，再也写不下去了，不知道怎么办。
那好，首先，我再重申，不要去用那种很无聊的用in the first place替换firstly，因为这两个词都只不过是表达你下面要表达的内容的逻辑顺序，先说哪个后说哪个，重要但不是最重要的，别人要知道的是你首先要表达的到底是什么。如果你要想与众不同点可以把firstly改成primarily?词就显得高级了点。(但对老外来说差不多就是了)
再者就是重点了，写一个句子前你要问自己三个问题：1)你同意他到什么程度?非常同意，敷衍地同意，还是完全彻底的同意 2)你在哪个方面同意他?物质上，精神上，还是肉体上 3)同意他什么东西?他的意见，思维，行为，还是其他。4)什么样的意见?In short，当你写到这个同学的这个层面上的时候，只能说明你有了你要表达意思的框架，那你要表达的细节呢?相信大家其实都已经想好细节了，或者想都不用想心里一下就有谱了，但是因为是英语，所以大家怕于表达，哪怕是中文也懒于表达，为什么不表达出来呢!表达出来不就有字数了吗!而且把这些细节写出来，你整句话的表达就非常到位了，读者也能一下准确接受到你要表达的意思和深浅。而且这样的细节本身并不是为了凑字数用的，本来就是一种表达的需要，别人需要的是从你那里得到尽可能多的细节和信息。比如老板问你最近公司财务如何，你说还不错，老板会觉得你在敷衍他，因为你没有告诉他细节而他想知道的也是细节。同样的东西，写一句话你能尽可能得多问自己几个问题，多扣那些细节出来，那你表达不就到位了吗?
根据这个思路，我们来扩充一下这个同学的这句话：
比如说，我首先是完全同意你，再者我在精神上同意你，(可能物质上有困难)，同意的是你的观点(可能你的行为我就不同意了)，而且你的观点是独特的。这样一下，细节有了，就可以成句了。
Primarily, I totally agree with your unique opinion mentally.
这样句子就要八个词了，而这时候你只是不带感情的表达了你的意思，如果要再带上感情的表达，不就又有字数又有感情色彩了吗?这时候，还有一个问题，就是agree with其实还不准确，没有力度，或者说不够细节化，没有一种倾向性强烈的感觉，如果改成support，虽然这个词很简单，但是明显比agree with更给人以力度，也更有倾向性，让人更明白你是支持他的而不仅是同意而已，这就涉及到用词到位准确的问题，这在后面的内容会提到。
Primarily, I totally support your unique opinion mentally, whether rightly or wrongly.
不管对错与否，首先我都在精神上完全支持你独特的观点。
这时候句子就有12个词了，而四六级的句子一般都在12个词左右，这样的句子不仅字数上够了，还表达到位了，何乐而不为呢?
还有是一个用词的问题，也是一个非常大的问题，这就需要大家去积累了，需要去背词什么的了。
第一，用词要准确到位，尽量不要用那些很泛意思的词，比如说do, is, make, get等
例子：I walk along the river under the moonlight.. (walk，river)
请注意walk这个词，让我们假想你是在忙完一天繁重的工作后，诗情画意的沿小河走，这时候walk便不足以表达你的放松和惬意，用中文说此时的 walk就是散步，为什么不用amble呢?此时的amble更能说明你此时的心情而不仅仅是泛泛的走而已。同样的道理，river是泛指所有的河流，不分大小粗细，而如果你此时想那天你走的就是一条小溪而且那时确实很浪漫，brook是不是比river更加细节化而准确了呢?当然这都是基于你对词汇的掌握量和掌握的准确度有关，所以还是要下苦功夫去读去背。
所以成句后比较好的是:
I amble along the brook under the moonlight.
我在月光下沿着小溪散步
而用泛词或者不准确的表达会出现你的表达不准确甚至出丑，比如说你挤牛奶，写了get some milk from cattles,或者make some milk from cattles，翻译成中文就是从牛那儿搞点牛奶，或者取点牛奶，而且cattle是泛指所有的牛包括公牛和母牛(cow)，是不是很可笑而且很不地道，文章自然也大失色彩,让人判为低级。
第二，副词(组)或从句的使用
很多时候的使用往往可以收到很好的效果。副词就是形容一个状态或者行动的词，它可以表示程度，情况，方面等等，所以一句话里加上一两个副词很多时候可以让表达更准确。当每句话都用副词的话，句子不就很千篇 一律了?副词和一些副词词组的替换使用可以克服这个问题。
比如前面的agree with的那个例子，mentally就很准确的告诉了别人你同意的是在精神的层面上，物质上等等其他的不一定同意，因为没钱或者其他原因，这就限定和细节化了你所要表达的意思的范围。而如果当你发现你已经有一句了hastily,而后面那句还要表达草率的程度时候，不妨换个in hasty，这样词就避免了重复。
To sum up, 要准确的表达你的意思，一定要做到的两点就是第一能尽可能多的在句子中填加你要表达的细节，这些细节表达了你所到说的意思的程度和范围等等，第二就是要用词准确到位，不要为了凑字数而去凑字数，而要想的是最准确的告诉读者你所要表达的所有意思。这也是交流的关键。
篇6：逐条解读GRE写作6大评分标准
1. complexity
事物的两面性(同一事物有优点就有缺点，相比较的事物有各自的优缺点)，从多角度分析事物(分析不同领域中，不同情况下)。论点一边倒的文章论述得再好也只能得5分。
2.insightful position
在有全面深刻理解的基础上，观点最好新颖独到(对ets来说)，但必须保证能自圆其说。5分文的要求是well-considered position,因此只要求多论述几个理由，多考虑几个方面，表明你确实好好思考过，而不强求对论述题目有全面深刻的认识。看看ets范文的3篇5分文，你就能感觉的它们和6分文在思考深刻全面上的差距。所以，若对某方面论题不了解，还有一个月就要上考场的话，就不必花大时间饿补相关知识，只需看看别人的提纲，结合自己肚里的东西(足够)，整理出自己的提纲，GRE考场上有条理性的加以论证。但切记，既然在这个给分点上你已经失去了优势，就应该在其他给分点下功夫：论述结构，论证技巧以及语言运用。
3. conveys meaning skillfully
可用于论证的一切技巧(估计老美自己用起来也得费点心思)。比如文章的行文方向，起承转合不用明显的标志词(first, second, however, on the other hand, the second example illustrating my point)，而是依靠论述的内在脉络(只可意会不可言传)自然而然的引到下一块内容。总之是看不到transitional phrases确能明显感觉到论述的方向及其改变(例ets范文2, 6分文的第二段首句的作用)。再比如巧妙地运用引言代替自己的reason(如ets范文1的As the head once said)。再有一个深受老美喜爱的论证技巧：vivid metaphor(如ets范文1的to inspect only one's toenails is to ignore the whole body)，使枯燥的reason生动形象。总之，此点是用来筛选6分文的，故对5分文作者不要求。5分文的要求是conveys meaning clearly,所以把话说清楚别词不达意，茶壶煮饺子倒不出来就行。
4. compelling reasons
这是最重要的一个得分点。就是你的理由及其论证，目的是让读者认可你的理由，从而接受论点。5分文要求logically sound reasons,结合ets范文可看出6分文要求理由非常有说服力，而5分文要求理由合常理，读者认为没错即可。
5.persuasive examples
用来支持reason的，使抽象的reason更具体，更易被读者理解，从而产生共鸣，或使其更可信，更有说服力。可用的例子有自己的经历，引言。在范文里Ets重点表扬过两种举例方式：1). extended examples(见范文1, 6分文)，叙述例子的过程就是reason的过程;2). examples are varied(见反问2，6分文)，举各个领域的例子或例子涉及的范围很广。恰切的例子一定要论述充分(不然ets都替你可惜)。5分文要求well-chosen examples, 4分要求是relevant examples，因此，要达到5分要求，例子一定得典型，多少有点说服力。个人经历是最好的例子，但不能是特例。
6. well-focused
简单说就是不跑题。中心论点明确，全文不跑题;各段主题句明确，围绕主题句论述。使读者读完后对行文脉络，各段段意有清晰的印象。5分的要求是：is focused，内容上不如6分文联系那么紧密，但也应给读者留下同样的印象 。
GRE写作模仿范文的方法
1.要有可以模仿的文章(最好是带有说理性的文章)。
2.你要理解这个文章，理解它的用词、句子结构、段落结构。
3.这些文章都有正确的中文翻译。同时，文章的长度不能超过500字。
怎么模仿，首先要分析文章，分析每一句和上一句是什么关系。我给大家举个例子：美国人写作文的一个特点是，通常每段的第一句都包含了整段文字的内容，也就是我们常说的topic sentence.。
另一个特点是当你写完一个句子后，你要问WHY。你提出一个问题，然后给出一个圆满的回答，这就是一篇优秀的作文。
再下一步就要具体了。写作需要三大能力：
一、具体化的能力
具体化并不代表要写一个完整的故事。但是任何一篇文章都要给人一个具体的意向。通过具体的东西来描述才能给人踏实的感觉。具体化只要举出几个地方、几个名字、几件小事就可以了。
为什么好多同学作文中分数很低呢，就是因为他提出了问题却没有回答。
你通过不断地模仿写作，就可以不断地纠正语法和词组错误。如何把抽象和具体结合起来是一个重点，如何在一个段落中只表达一个思想，这是另一个重点。美国人的判分特点是，如果你在一段中表达了一个以上的思想，那你的分数就不会高了。
分析完一篇文章后，怎么模仿着写呢?就是看着中文的翻译，把上面的英文一字不落的写下来，当你实在想不起来的时候，再看原文。等到写完之后，和原文对照一下，看看是谁写得漂亮。我刚刚开始模仿写作的时候发现，模仿了几天后，写作水平的确提高了。
因为根据记忆学原则，这个单词你背过、读过，它都不能写在你的文章中间。如果一个单词可以经常出现在你的脑子和文章中间，那这只证明了一件事，就是你写过这个字。但是你自己写作你不可能用到这个字，那就只有一个可能，就是你在模仿文章时写过这个字。如果一个结构别人写不出来，你能写出来，那你的分数就会高。
通过不断地模仿你的几大能力就会得到提高：
1.你的语法错误会越来越少;
2.句子结构能力越来越强;
3.用词能力大大增加。
一篇文章模仿两次就足够了。当你模仿了10篇文章之后，你把这10篇文章再模仿一遍。等你模仿完20篇文章，你的写作能力就会大大提高了。
二、逻辑思维能力
在美国许多的写作考试中TOEFL写作是相对容易的。因为它的作文题本身非常简单，看到一个作文题你几乎就知道该怎么写。而GRE作文就相对复杂了。GRE作文方式永远是两种态度，两种方式让你选择。它永远是有对照性的。
TOEFL作文考：“吃饭是在家里吃好，还是到饭店里吃好”; GMAT考和商业有关的：“产品制造出来是延续时间很长的好，还是延续时间不太长的好”;GRE作文：“在我们这个社会中间，现在专业人士太多了，而有综合知识的人太少了。你认为我们是更需要具有专业知识的人呢，还是需要具有广博知识的人?”
TOEFL考生活、学习;GRE 考日常学术行为。但是不管它出什么题目，总是会摆出两种态度供你选择。另外，GRE的作文题目是提前发给你的，考试时出的题目绝不会超出它事先发给你的题目。它决不会出让学生看不懂的题目。所出的题目永远是世界性的，不涉及民族、宗教、政治色彩。
考察普林斯顿所出的全部范文后发现，美国人百分之七八十喜欢倾向于一种模式。讨论在哪里吃的问题时，要不在家里吃，要不在饭店吃，但是你不要又想在家里，又想在饭店(A OR B)。
当然他们也比较认可中间的态度(C)，也就是说，我既要A又要B，我是A和B结合起来产生C。事实上，好多中国学生结合 A、B写是能写出好分数的。当然也有些题目是没有C这种态度的。
C态度这种写法和A、B的写法，在段落结构上是有差异的。我先讲两种文章的段落结构。
GRE写作15个例句整理
1、超越性的题目：
现实与理想;眼前利益与长期利益;集体身份与人格独立;规约与自由，利己与利他、竞争与合作、客观束缚与主观能动
人类之所以纠结，在于沉重的肉身和高傲的灵魂之间不可调和的矛盾。人若是卑微，总是世俗的纷扰让我们难以自拔;人若是高尚，只是因为心中的理想。我们是魔鬼的孩子，却长着天使的翅膀。
A man suffers from inescapable pain, a torturing split between the sunken flesh and the arrogant soul. So sunken the flesh is that a man indulges himself into lust, sloth, greed and hatred, so arrogant the soul is that he never abandons his rights of morality, religion, passion and freedom. A man is never a demon, nor is he an angel.
2、虚无性的题目：
知识、科技、实践、经验、批判思维、历史的真伪、文化存在的本质为人对所存在事物的感知，故而世界的本质便是虚无。
The existence only exists in people's perception, which, by nature, is of vanity.
3、时间性题目：
传统与创新、历史是否可以被借鉴、科技与人文、进步
时间对于个体来说是线性而不可逆转的;而对于整个宇宙，无非是一个周而复始的圆圈。
Time for individuals is consecutive and irreversible, but for the universe, just a repetitive circle.
4、政府与人民
人民除了权利，什么都没有，甚至没有使用权利的基本能力。因而他们选举了一个叫做政府的机构。
Citizens, apart from claiming to have rights, in fact, have no capability to exercise their rights. Therefore, they select a government.
5、个体与集体、身份、领导者与大众
他人给了你身份，故而，他们就是你的地狱。
Others bestow you an identity, and thus, they are the hell.
6、政治与道德
政治是权力的斗争和利益的平衡。民主只是用制度制约人性的本恶。
Nothing is politics but the struggle of power and the balance of interests.
7、教育、传统与创新、批判思考
教育用束缚的方式，启迪了人们如何通过继承而达到颠覆的目的。
Education, by means of confinement, enlightens people to inherit and then to overthrow the past.
8、人民与政府
政府是必要的恶。以自由为代价，确保了正义和公平。
Government is a necessary evil, ensuring the justice but at the cost of individual freedom.
9、领导、名人、英雄、信仰
人需要神从而不至迷茫;人需要颠覆神，因为神本身就是人造的产物。
By the guidance of idols, people are not perplexed; yet, they always destroy the idols and replace them with new ones, for idols are created to be destroyed.
10、科技与自然、革命与改革、领导与大众、理想与现实、主观与客观、勇气与卑微
人与外在世界永远处于斗争之中，只不过一些人为了苟活妥协了;而另一些人为了信仰反抗了。妥协的人不一定活下来了;反抗的人也未必真的牺牲了。甚至，妥协的人未必不是英雄;而反抗的人也不是注定不朽。总之，世界不曾改变，改变的只是你我。
Human beings are always in a fight with external world. Some have compromised, and some still persist. The compromised are not blessed to live; and the persisted, not necessarily martyrs. Or even, the compromised are indeed heroes, and the persisted, fading away. The world does not change. We do.
11、表象与本质、目的与方法、批评与赞扬、批判与继承
表象的对立往往意味着本质的相同。
Superficial confrontation indicates the similarity of essence.
12、科技与人文;创新与传统
科技貌似推动人类向前，可前方是一片彷徨;人文让我们照见过往，给了我们存在希望。
Technology seemingly pushes humans forward, yet forward to the unknown; humanities mirror humans into the past, the past of existence and hope.
13、批判、传统与创新、教育
批判的前提的训练和继承。
The prerequisite of rational critical thinking is the arduous training and undistinguished inheritance.
14、个体与集体、创新与传统、自由
个体的伟大在于始终与集体不懈的斗争。个人追逐自由，集体限制自由。
The greatness of individuals lies in the uncompromised struggle against the collective conformity. They fight for freedom, a freedom banned by the collectivism.
15、法律与道德
法律限制人的基本的恶，来自于政府，让人不至于沦为恶魔;道德是让人性更加光辉，从而成为天使。
Laws prohibit human’s evils. It is the invention from government. By laws, humans do not turn to demons; morality glorifies humans, turning them into angels.
GRE写作句子类型的整理
1、否定句。
使用否定的时候，比如：什么什么对个人不好，对社会也不好。为什么不来个倒装?
Never/neither/nor/seldom /rarely/on no account + is…
2、虚拟倒装。
当你想表达“如果怎么怎么样，就是另外一种情况”—虚拟语气。为什么不来个虚拟倒装?
Were(Had) it…，something would......
3、强调句的使用：
It is people who…/ it is something that…
4、让步句式的使用：
“无论什么样的情况下”：
However/No matter how/ whatever/no matter what ….
还有一种：
Cogent as this response is, it has some minor errors. Somewhat reasonable as the issue presents, it does not experience a case-by- case examination.
还有比较常用的：
although... It should be admittedly that…，however it does not follow that
5、疑问句。
用于开头，来个设问句，在自问自答，提出自己观点;用于段中，比如举设想的例子：
Can you imagine that…?/ How can one imagine…?
6、定语从句。
这个大家一般用的比较熟练，但是注意不要太罗嗦：
…society where(in which)…，/ something on which we depend (on which…based)
7、The more…the more…句式的使用。
人们越幸福，社会越稳定啦 等等。
8、Not only…but also的使用。
很好用的，ETS经典的6分范文：专才VS通才不就用了两个吗?
9、without的使用。
从反面说，很是能够增加字数。还是那篇范文的结尾，就来了两个非常妙的without。
10、一些比较常用的句式：
There is no denying that…/ there is no doubt that…
11、还有一个句子：
So powerful the scandal is that Watergate became the talk of the world.如此..以至于..
逐条解读GRE写作6大评分标准
篇7：GRE写作评分标准和高分作文心得讲解
【复习秘籍】GRE写作评分标准和高分作文心得讲解
GRE作文计分方式
GRE作文总分是6分，按照0.5分的最小分值进行扣分，4分是及格分数，如果无法达到，那么你的写作能力亟需加强。
6分(outstanding)，对事件的复杂性的分析清楚有力;熟练驾驭有效写作的要素。
5分(strong)：对事件的复杂性有充分的分析;很好地掌握了有效写作的要素。
4分(adequate)：对事件的复杂性有一定的分析;对写作的要素有一定的掌握。
熟悉提纲
在开始正式写作之前，首先要做到的就是熟悉提纲。如果备考时间充足，那么请尽量过一下每道作文题目，思考如何展开，并且举出恰当的例子。如果备考时间比较紧张，也要至少把高频题库仔细过一遍，保证做到一看题就知道怎么写。可以参考一下各类关于写作提纲方面的备考资料，会对你准备自己的提纲有所帮助。提纲的练习建议每天都不间断的进行，对你的写作思路是个很好的持续练习过程。
积累素材
GRE写作需要用到大量的例子，不要只准备几个人人都在用的俗套例子，最好在练习和平时阅读的过程中就开始积累，如果有结合个人经历的独特例子，你的文章会变得特别出彩，也更容易吸引考官注意，得到高分。
提笔写文
当你积累了一定数量的提纲和素材之后，就可以开始着手写完整文章了，一开始写得时候可以先不管时间要求，尽量写出一篇能让自己满意的完整作文，习惯一下写作的节奏，之后坚持每天至少写一到两篇文章，并逐渐加上时间要求，即使备考时间不足，也要保证每天至少要练习写作。
以上是关于GRE写作的大致评分标准和高分写法的具体介绍，希望大家也能从中受益，加强自己的写作练习，写出漂亮的GRE高分好文章。
每日GRE词汇精选
1.ossify /‘ɑs?fa?/ vt. & vi. 骨化,硬化;使僵化
【解词】oss-=骨头;同根词osseous 骨的，骨质的，多骨的。
【例句】Without this intermediation, money would not change hands, economic growth would stall and society would ossify. 没有这种媒介，货币就无法交换，经济增长就会停滞，社会就会僵化。
2.prolix /‘prol?ks/ adj. 好长篇大论的，冗长的
【解词】pro-=向前;liqu-=liquid-=液体，不断地向前流动的，引申为“冗长的”。
【例句】He found the narrative too prolix and discursive. 他觉得这篇论文太啰嗦、太不着边际。
3.jocular /‘d?ɑkj?l?/ adj. 爱开玩笑的，滑稽的，幽默的
【解词】jocu-=joke,joy;玩笑,欢乐。
【例句】she sounded in a jocular mood. 她听起来像是在开玩笑。
4.salient /‘sel??nt/ adj. 显著的,重要的,主要的;(指角)凸出的
【解词】sal-=salt-=leap,跳跃，-ent为形容词后缀。跳起来的，即“显著的，重要的”。同根词 assault 攻击，insult 侮辱(in-=on，跳到某人上面，即凌驾于某人之上，即“侮辱”)
【例句】It succinctly covered all the salient points of the case. 它简洁地报道了事情的所有要点。
5.qualm /kwɑm/ n. 疑虑;不安
【解词】源自古英语，最初时候的含义是“死亡，杀死，疾病，折磨”，之后程度减轻，用来形容“衰弱的感觉”，之后用其引申义表示“不安，怀疑”。同源词 quell vt. 镇压;减轻;平息;消除，quell最初的含义是“使死亡，使消亡”，引申为现在的“减轻，消除”。
【例句】He felt no qualms about borrowing money from friends. 他没有对于从朋友那里借钱感到不安。
6.doleful /‘dolfl/ adj. 悲哀的;阴沉的;忧郁的;寂寞的
【解词】dol-=grieve，悲伤;-ful为形容词后缀;同根词 condolence 哀悼，吊唁。
【例句】a doleful loss. 令人悲伤的损失
7.archetype /‘ɑrk?'ta?p/ n. 典型;原型
【解词】arch-=最初的(如archeology n. 考古学, 古物学)，因此archetype 表示“原型”。
【例句】an archetype of the successful entrepreneur. 成功企业家的完美典范
8.stymie /?sta?mi/ vt. 妨碍,阻挠
【解词】最初指打高尔夫的时候，对手的球堵上了球洞的现象(妨碍求)，后引申为“妨碍，阻挠”。
9.inundate /‘?n?ndet/ vt. 泛滥;淹没;浸水
【解词】in-=里面，und-=wave，波浪，因此表示“使处于波浪中”，即“犯懒，淹没”。und-=wave的同根词，redundant 冗长的。
【例句】We've been inundated with complaints from listeners. 听众的投诉让我们应接不暇。
10.pernicious /p?’n???s/ adj. 很有害的;恶性的
【解词】per-=through，一直，nic-=nox-=hurt，poison，伤害，毒;-ous为形容词后缀，表示数量很多，或程度很深。因此这个词表示“很有害的”。nox-=noc-=hurt，poison，同根词 innocent 无知的，无辜的，无害的。noxious 有害的，有毒的。
【例句】the pernicious influences of the mass media. 大众传媒的有害影响。
每日GRE词汇精选
1.solicitous /s?’l?s?t?s/ adj. 关心的,挂念的;热切的,渴望的
【例句】solicitous of his help 渴望得到他的帮助
2.discordant /d?s’k?rd?nt/ adj. 不和的,不一致的,不调和的;不谐和的
dis-=否定;cord-=heart; -ant为形容词后缀，因此这个词表示心思不一样的，即“不和的，不一致的”。
【例句】a study of children in discordant homes. 对有矛盾家庭孩子的研究。
3.unremitting /??nr?’m?t??/ adj. 不懈的
un-=not; re-=back,回来;mit-=send，因此这个词表示不倒退的，一直向前的，即“不懈的”。 【例句】adhere to the principle with an unremitting tenacity 百折不挠地坚持原则
4.thrifty /‘θr?fti/ adj. 节约的;茂盛的;成功的
名词 thrift n. 节俭, 节约;同源词 thrive vi. 兴盛; 兴隆(词根riv-=river，最开始的含义是“河流两畔，草木繁盛”，引申为“繁荣”)。
【例句】She was a thrifty woman and managed to put aside some money every month. 她是个很会持家的妇女, 每月都设法存些钱。
5.robust /ro’b?st/ adj. 强健的;健康的;粗野的;粗鲁的
robor-=strength, 同根词corroborate vt. 证实,支持(某种说法、信仰、理论等)。著名品牌“乐百氏”，就是这个词哦~
【例句】a robust and athletic young woman 一个强壮活泼的年轻妇女。
6.untoward /?n’t?rd/ adj. 不幸的;麻烦的;倔强的;困难的
un-=not; toward 朝向;因此表示“事与愿违的”，引申为“困难的，麻烦的”。
【例句】Untoward circumstances prevent me from being with you on this festive occasion.有些不幸的事件使我不能在这欢庆的时刻和你在一起。
7.laconic /l??kɑn?k/ adj. 简洁的，简明的
源自地名Lakon,古希腊斯巴达的属地，该地人民以说话简洁著称。
【例句】His laconic reply suggested a lack of interest in the topic. 他简明的回答显得他对该话题缺乏兴趣。
8.illustrious /?’l?str??s/ adj. 著名的, 杰出的, 卓越的
il-=in-=en，使动;lust-=光;-ous为形容词后缀，表示数量很多，因此这个词的根本含义是“很多光的”，引申为”著名的，杰出的“。
【例句】All sorts of illustrious and influential persons lent their names to our national culture. 各种有名望有影响的人大声疾呼支持我们的民族文化。
9.circuitous /s?’kj??t?s/ adj. 迂回的;绕行的
circu-=circle,圆圈;绕着圈的，即“迂回的，绕行的”。
【例句】They took a circuitous route to avoid reporters. 他们绕道避开了记者。
10.astute /?’stut/ adj. 机敏的,精明的,狡猾的
【例句】A good leader must be an astute judge of ability. 一个优秀的领导人必须善于识别人的能力。
每日GRE词汇精选
1.squelch /skw?lt?/ vt. 镇压;消除;压碎
最早来自拟声词，用来形容东西落下、压碎的声音。这个词其实可以表达我们现在说的“碾压”。
【例句】Squelch a rumor. 消除流言蜚语
2.deprecate /‘d?pr?ket/ vt. 不赞成, 反对
de-=反对，离开;prec-=pray ，这个词的最初含义是：祈祷恶魔离开，表达这种憎恶的感情，后来词义通用，表示“反对”。
【例句】He deprecates the value of children's television. 他贬低儿童电视节目的价值。
3.enamor /?n’?m?/ vt. 使迷恋，使倾心
en-=使动;amor-=amour，爱;因此enamor 表示“使迷恋”。
【例句】Her beauty enamored the prince. 她的美貌迷住了王子。
4.winsome /‘w?ns?m/ adj. 迷人的;可爱的;引人注目的
win 赢得，-some形容词后缀，因此表示“赢得人的心的”，即“迷人的，可爱的”。
【例句】a winsome smile. 一个动人的笑容。
5.compunction /k?m’p??k??n/ n. 内疚, 后悔, 懊悔
com-=一起，完全;punct-=point，sharp;点，尖;因此这个词表示“浑身像针刺一样”，引申为“内疚，后悔”。
【例句】compunctions of conscience 良心的苛责
6.incisive /?n’sa?s?v/ adj. 敏锐的;深刻的;锋利的
in-=里面;cis-=cide-=cut;因此表示“切入的”，引申为“敏锐的，深刻的”。
【例句】an incisive mind; incisive comments. 锐利的头脑;尖锐的评论
7.aggrandize /?’ɡr?nd?zm?nt/ n. 增大,强化,扩大
agg-=强调;grand-=big，大，因此表示“使变大”，即“增大，强化”。
【例句】All he desired was to aggrandize his estate. 他所希望的只是扩充他的家业。
8.bleak /blik/ adj. 荒凉的，无遮蔽的;阴冷的;黯淡的
blea-=blanc-=white，白色的，空白的;只有白色这一种颜色的，因此表示“无遮蔽的，荒凉的”。
【例句】a bleak urban landscape.凄凉的城市景色。
9.parsimonious /?pɑrs?’mon??s/ adj. 过分节俭的;吝啬的;小气的
源自名词 parsimony n. 异常俭省,极度节俭; par-=节俭，节约;-mony 为名词后缀。这个词还可以通过联想记忆法记忆，读音是不是很像“怕失money”。
【例句】A classic example comes from comedian Jack Benny, famous for his parsimony. 有个经典例子出自以吝啬著称的喜剧演员杰克·班尼。
10.glib /ɡl?b/adj. <贬>(演讲者或演讲)油腔滑调的;不诚恳的;肤浅的
gl-=发光，流畅;引申为“油腔滑调”。
【例句】You are certainly blessed with a glib tongue. 你倒真会说话!
篇8：GRE高分作文写作步骤和评分标准解读
第一段： 开头段。主要是归纳论点，说明论点有问题，存在逻辑漏洞，准备发起进。
第一层：This argument concludes/recommends/argues that…
第二层：To support this conclusion the writer cites…/points out that…
第三层：However, this argument suffers from several critical flaws and is thereforeunconvincing/ unpersuasive as it stands.
第二段和第三段甚至第四段：分类别去攻击各个逻辑错误。(以因果关系类错误为例)
One problem with the argument is that, the editorialobserves a correlation between… and …, then concludes that the former is thecause of the latter. However, the editorial fails to rule out other possibleexplanations for…For example,… Any of these factors, or other social, politicalor economic factors, might lead to…Without ruling out all other such factors itis unfair to conclude that…
第五段： 结尾段。作者的结论似乎是合理的，但是通过论证，不是这样的。因此作者在做出决定之前，应该还要考虑其他情况。我们通过一篇文章作为实例来介绍论证步骤和论证方法以及文章结构。
